Standard Question Currently Working in Childcare?
People who work with young children, or in child protective services Lawyers and paralegals Administrators of all types of community programs or their sponsoring organizations Non-professional line staff home health aides, overnight staff at residential facilities and shelters In some states, many of these people -- medical personnel, mental health workers, social workers, educators and others who work with children and youth -- are legally considered mandated reporters.
A mandated reporter is required by law to report any suspected instance of child physical or sexual abuse or child neglect. Most formal codes of professional ethics demand such reporting as well. What are the ethical issues that need to be considered, and how do they play out in community interventions?
Not all of the areas discussed below are covered by a specific legal or ethical code for every profession or community service, but are nonetheless related to ethical behavior for just about any program or organization. All should at least be considered as you define ethics for yourself and your program.
It protects both participants and the organization from invasion of privacy, and establishes a bond of trust between the participant and the program. No one but the individual working with a particular participant will have access to information about or records of that participant without her permission.
At this level of confidentiality, records and notes are usually kept under lock and key, and computer records should be protected by electronic coding or passwords.
Most programs not required by law or professional ethics to keep all information confidential do so anyway, both out of moral scruples and to establish trust with their participants. There are, however, specific exceptions to complete confidentiality.
If the program staff member is a mandated reporter for child abuse and neglect, if the participant presents a threat to himself or others, or if the staff member is subpoenaed in a legal case, both the law and ethical codes generally require that the staff person put her responsibilities to the law or to the safety of others above her promise of confidentiality.
Some program staff may consider their relationship with participants to be ethically more important than legal considerations. They may either not take or periodically destroy notes from meetings with participants; refuse to testify in court cases and risk being fined or incarcerated for contempt of court ; or simply "not remember " the relevant information.
What are the obligations of that youth worker at the beginning of this section?
Exceptions to confidentiality should be made clear to participants at the beginning of their involvement in the program see "Disclosure" below. Information is confidential within a program, but may be shared among staff members for purposes of consultation and delivering better services to the participant.
Teachers in an adult literacy program, for instance, may confer about a student with a particular learning disability or problem. This type of sharing is consistent with the rules of the Family Educational Right to Privacy Act, popularly known as the Buckley Amendment, which protects academic records.
This act was meant to assure both that student records were not distributed to non-school recipients without the permission of the student or her family, and that students and their families would have free access to copies of their records.
It also gives those students and their families the right to question any elements of those records, and to negotiate corrections where necessary. This kind of arrangement usually requires that participants be told about it from the beginning, and that they sign release forms giving the program permission to share records and information under appropriate circumstances.
Information is confidential within a program, but is submitted to funding sources as documentation of services provided. This situation can lead to problems if participants have been promised complete confidentiality.Legislated.
and ethical responsibilities of staff: A Quick Guide. Page 1 of community. This guide provides a starting point to help you understand your crucial responsibilities and we UniSA has a legal responsibility to take all reasonable steps to prevent unlawful discrimination and harassment, including sexual harassment and.
The legal framework refers to the system of relevant federal and state constitutions, Acts of parliament and regulations which all community and disability services workers must comply with. Figure 1: Legal and ethical framework for human services workers.
issues that are likely to arise through your work as a service provider.
For example, most organisations will have a code of ethics and/or a code of conduct in place to inform the work of their staff.
A code of ethics is a set of core ethical principles that informs and guides ethical practice within a profession. Not all of the areas discussed below are covered by a specific legal or ethical code for every profession or community service, but are nonetheless related to ethical behavior for just about any program or organization.
Achieving and staying true to professional nursing values while practicing in the correctional setting can create a unique set of ethical, legal and professional issues for the nurse.
This article will examine some of the ethical and legal issues correctional nurses must address in their practice. of ethics from service providers and/or industry bodies to help inform this section of the training. In addition to the National Standards for Disability Services, there are a number of other important frameworks that provide guidance on how to respond to legal and ethical issues that are likely to arise through your work as a service provider.